by Elio
Wonderful, wonderful Copenhagen
Friendly old girl of a town
Wonderful Copenhagen, lyrics by Frank Loesser
At the June General Meeting of the ASM in Boston, there was a session called From Bacterial Physiology to Cellular Genetics: Reflections on the 50th Anniversary of Schaechter, Maaløe, and Kjeldgaard. The participants were Fred Neidhardt, Stephen Cooper, Amy Vollmer, and myself.
Fifty years ago, it so happens, I was wrapping up my postdoc in the lab of Ole Maaløe (pronounced something like Moh-lö — "umlaut" on the o) in Copenhagen. It was also at that time that our two papers on growth physiology of Salmonella enterica var. Typhimurium appeared. (For PubMed citations to these papers, click here and here.) So, what is all this current fuss about? Our work and that of others led to the realization that when organisms grow in various media, their size and gross content of cell constituents (proteins, DNA, RNA, lipids, etc.) is directly proportional to their growth rate. The faster they grow, the more of these constituents they have. This holds true as long as the cultures are growing exponentially and thus are at a steady state. Two media differing in composition but supporting the same growth rate give the same measurements. We concluded that a bacterium can exist in any one of a number of physiological states depending on its rate of growth. As an illustration, cells of the same species observed under slow versus fast growing conditions can vary in volume by a factor of 10 or more!
This work helped clear up what had been a rather confusing state of affairs regarding bacterial growth. The classical, more-or-less S-shaped growth curve could now be interpreted as an exponential phase bracketed by two transitions, first from slow to fast growth and then from fast to slow growth (a shift up and a shift down). Details and further interpretations will soon be available in a review by Cooper recently accepted for publication in BioEssays.
What came of this?

















