Moselio Schaechter


  • The purpose of this blog is to share my appreciation for the width and depth of the microbial activities on this planet. I will emphasize the unusual and the unexpected phenomena for which I have a special fascination... (more)

    For the memoirs of my first 21 years of life, click here.

Associate Bloggers



  • (Click photo for more information.)

Bloggers Emeriti


  • (Click photo for more information.)

Meetings & Sponsors



« News Flash! | Main | The Limitations of LB Medium »

November 05, 2009

It Was The Worst of Times, It Was the Best of Times

by Elio

At the end of the Permian period, about 250 million years ago and not long before the dinosaurs appeared, life on Earth experienced its greatest catastrophe: a mass extinction that did away with the vast majority of life forms on land and sea. The question arises, who ate the carcasses of the deceased? Surely bacteria and protozoa digested the animal corpses, most likely reaching unusually high population sizes as the result. But who took care of the masses of dead plant material? Fungi are quite good at digesting plants, especially woody plants. So, did the fungi also become prevalent after the catastrophe?

There is evidence for this belief. As the Permian period came to an end, there was a massive spike in the population of Reduviasporonites, a "morphogenus" of microscopic organisms fossilized as single cells or multicellular chains. (The -ites ending is sometimes used to denote organisms known only as fossils. Reduvius, if you care for such things, comes from the Latin reduvia meaning hangnail or remnant. Just why it was called that, I don't know.) Apparently they thrived at that time, as judged by the abundance and the widespread geographic distribution of their fossils. More recently, they have had a checkered taxonomic career. Originally thought of as fungi, they were later relegated to the microscopic algae. It makes a difference. If wood-decaying fungi, they suggest a massive loss of standing biomass on land. If algae, picture widespread swamping. Now, they are back among the fungi. Maybe.

Reduviasporonites_flip

Chains of fossil Reduviasporonites.
Bar = 40 µm. Source.

Panel_f4

Conidiophores and conidia of Cladosporium
oxysporum
. Source: Dr. Fungus Library.

The evidence? A new paper in Geology is one of the latest to deal with this question. They used "high-sensitivity equipment, partly designed to detect interstellar grains in meteorites." Their pyrolysis GC-MS of fossil Reduviasporonites showed that they do not contain the algal biomarkers, such as breakdown products of chlorophyll—a strike against the algal theory. In addition, these researchers found the ratio of N15 to N14 in the material to be characteristic of that seen in fungi, and distinct from that for algae. Another point for the fungal side.

What do these "disaster species" look like? They are usually seen as chains of ovoid cells, each around 25 µm in diameter. Many fungi on today's Earth look quite similar. If Reduviasporonites were indeed fungi, much of the planet must have been covered by a mushy mess of mycelia. For the time-traveler, it would have been the worst of times.

ResearchBlogging.org

Sephton, M., Visscher, H., Looy, C., Verchovsky, A., & Watson, J. (2009). Chemical constitution of a Permian-Triassic disaster species Geology, 37 (10), 875-878 DOI: 10.1130/G30096A.1

Comments

Surely after a mass extinction the large amount of dead animal and plant material would be around for only the blink of an eye in geologial terms, and so would be unlikely to be a significant new food source or niche?

Elio replies:
You are right about the short duration of the corpses and detritus, but they could have supported a huge population of the fungi at the time. If these particular fungi were especially adept at becoming fossilized, one would expect them to be found in large amounts and constitute a record of what happened in the "blink of the eye".

Looking at these photomicrographs, one could scarcely imagine that the fossil chains of Reduviasporonites were anything BUT conidiophores and conidia. That could just be my personal bias talking. When I'm at the microscope, there's typically a fungus under it.

Great history!

Now we have, the Trilobites Age, the Ammonites Age, the Dinosaurs Age and the Fungi Age.

Regards

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Teachers' Corner

Podcast

How to Interact with This Blog

  • We welcome readers to answer queries and comment on our musings. To leave a comment or view others, remarks, click the "Comments" link in red following each blog post. We also occasionally publish guest blog posts from microbiologists, students, and others with a relevant story to share. If you are interested in authoring an article, please email us at elios179 at gmail dot com.

Subscribe via email

Translate




Search




MicrobeWorld News

Membership