Moselio Schaechter

  • The purpose of this blog is to share my appreciation for the width and depth of the microbial activities on this planet. I will emphasize the unusual and the unexpected phenomena for which I have a special fascination... (more)

    For the memoirs of my first 21 years of life, click here.

Associate Bloggers

  • (Click photo for more information.)

Bloggers Emeriti

  • (Click photo for more information.)

Meetings & Sponsors

« The Microscopic Flash Mob | Main | E. coli Keeps Its Powder Dry »

September 26, 2013

Who Would Have Thought? Biggest Flower, Biggest Gene Thief

by Elio

Rafflesias in the tropical rain forests of Southeast Asia produce some of the biggest flowers in the world—up to one meter in diameter. Adding to their notoriety is their carrion-like smell to attract insects for pollination service. They’re not microbes by anyone's definition of the term. The reason they make an appearance in these pages is that they have stolen a larger proportion of their genome via horizontal gene transfer (HGT) than any other organism we know of. Between 24% and 41% of their mitochondrial DNA is of foreign origin, and even in their nucleus a whopping 2.1% of the genes were imported.


Fully opened flower of Rafflesia arnoldii from the Palupu
Reserve near Bukittinggi, Indonesia. Photo by Troy Davis.

Plant genomes seem to be especially rife in genes acquired by HGT, and this is particularly true for the parasitic kinds, of which the Rafflesias are impressive examples. These freeloaders have no leaves or stems, no plastids anywhere—thus no photosynthesis. They live off host vines whose nutrients they harvest via haustoria, absorptive organs that penetrate into the host’s tissues. These un-plantlike plants exist concealed within their host vines, only occasionally offering a showy reproductive structure to the outer world—reminiscent of the mushrooms formed by underground fungal mycelia. Now we have learned that they are not only trophic parasites, but also genomic thieves.

Rafflesias and their host lineages diverged approximately 115 million years ago, which makes it easy to distinguish the transferred genes. During that time, the Rafflesias lost their photosynthetic organelles, so they offer no plastid DNA for study. Instead, the authors selected for investigation 38 mitochondrial genes that are found in most angiosperms, including both those coding for proteins and for ribosomal RNA. They compared these genes from two species of Rafflesia, one species from another closely-related genus, and three species of host vines (Vitaceae) using au courant transcriptomics, next-generation sequencing, and complementary data analysis. Most of the multitude of mitochondrial genes transferred to Rafflesia are intact and are actively transcribed. Many are in clusters that maintain their original order (synteny), thus suggesting acquisition by homologous recombination.

Moreover, the authors envision that these exchanges took place without the intervention of transposable elements, bacteria, or viruses, in other words, without any of the Small Things that we typically invoke as agents of HGT. How about that, biology can be exciting even without involving microbes!

How to account for this massive unidirectional gene theft? One can surmise that the intimate association of parasitic Rafflesias with their hosts facilitated this enormous amount of direct gene transfer. Thus we can expect that other parasitic plants (mistletoes, Indian pipes, broomrapes, dodder) will soon be subjected to similar scrutiny. Wouldn’t this have profound consequences all around the Tree of Life?

Zhenxiang Xi, Yuguo Wang, Robert K. Bradley, M. Sugumaran, Christopher J. Marx, Joshua S. Rest,, & Charles C. Davis (2013). Massive Mitochondrial Gene Transfer in a Parasitic Flowering Plant Clade PLoS Genetics, 9 (2) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003265


Oh, and I fully expect that Ford Doolittle's idea that the "Tree of Life" is festooned with genomic kudzu, will be shown to be the case.

Is this more kleptogenomic than our rotifer friends, Elio?

Maybe so. But this all just tells me that the natural world exchanges genetic information in an almost perversely promiscuous fashion! I used to tell students that HGT among prokaryotes puts Hollywood promiscuity to shame; it's like someone have children by their Caesar salad.

Maybe this plant is still more shameless?

Thanks again for such great material to discuss in class with my students!

where the genes come from? host? will have to find article. wait. genes moved TO the mitochondria? that's different!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Teachers' Corner


How to Interact with This Blog

  • We welcome readers to answer queries and comment on our musings. To leave a comment or view others, remarks, click the "Comments" link in red following each blog post. We also occasionally publish guest blog posts from microbiologists, students, and others with a relevant story to share. If you are interested in authoring an article, please email us at elios179 at gmail dot com.

Subscribe via email



MicrobeWorld News