Why are so many more phyla of Gram-negative bacteria than of Gram-positives (at least in the more conventionally used phylogenetic schemes)?
« Mushrooms And Global Warming | Main | It Takes Three to Tango »
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
The correct answer to the question, I think, was given by Jonathon Badger: there are more Gram-negative parasites of man than Gram-positive.
The concept of “complexity” in prokaryotes is very slippery. I think the only possible measure of it is genome size. In that case, there are examples of “complex” prokaryotes among Gram-positives (like Streptomyces) as well as among Gram-negatives (like Stigmatella).
On the other hand, when you get to eukaryotes — with two or even three different genomes in a single cell, and with translation physically separated from transcription, and with organelles like nuclei present — “complexity” requires different criteria. Maybe Wallace Arthur’s book on evo-devo, Creatures of Accident, gives some good ideas.
Posted by: stan zahler | April 16, 2007 at 03:50 PM