by Elio
Nameless orphaned bacteria from a lake sediment. Courtesy of D. E. Caldwell. Previously published on the covers of the 2003 issues of International Microbiology.
"Encyclopedia of Life To Catalogue Species" is the headline in the Washington Post that announces a multi-institutional grant of $12.5 million to list and describe 1.8 million species that have a name (about $7 a species). The estimate is that only 10% of all species fall in this category. From what we're learning about bacteria and archaea, the proportion for "our" organisms is almost certainly much lower. Microbes should get a quantity discount.
Actually, I'd argue quite the opposite. Microbial species should come at a premium since they can't be correctly identified without very expensive equipment, painstaking research, and less than 1% of them can be cultured in a lab. Even though microbes are more abundant, it takes a lot more work and technology to catalog them.
Posted by: Chris Condayan | May 11, 2007 at 01:33 PM