by Elio
A microcolony of E. coli developing on agar from three neighboring cells. ASM Microbe Library. Credit: J. Shapiro and C. Hsu.
The question arises: do bacteria get old? Of course they do, their being young immediately after cell division and old when they are about to divide again. But, in a different sense, do they age over many generations? Or, as is commonly assumed, does binary fission obliterate any difference between sibling cells? The question has been studied in detail by Eric Stewart and colleagues, with the surprising answer that conventional wisdom is wrong. There is a difference between the growth rates of "old" and "new" bacteria. Subtle, but there. This question, and a related one regarding the percentage of viable cells in a growing culture, has been discussed in a highly satisfying manner in a series of posts on John Dennehy's illuminating blog, Evilutionary Biologist. I had a small hand in it, as this repartee reminded me of an unassuming and unpublished experiment I did one hundred years ago (or so it seems).
Bacteria have a circular chromosome which is replicated completely every time it divides (unless there are mutations). However, Human chromosomes are linear and therefore can not be replicated fully by a 5' to 3' polymerase. We require telomerase to add extra telomers to the end of the chromosome so that it does not shorten with each generation. However, as we age telomerase is expressed in smaller quantities. Our cells age with passing generations because telomers are not added and our chromosomes shorten. Bacteria don't age because their chromosome is circular and can be completely replicated by a 5' to 3' polymerase.
Posted by: Biochem student | June 03, 2009 at 02:01 AM