It launch'd forth filament, filament, filament, out of itself…
Some bacteria naturally grow as filaments, for example, members of the actinomycetes. Many others, like, E. coli and B. subtilis, make filaments only when under stress – a fact that has been known for about one hundred years but is still a bit of a mystery. Many kinds of stress can prompt this response, including DNA damage that elicits the SOS response, partial inhibition of cell wall synthesis by antibiotics, and the expression of certain thermosensitive mutations affecting cell division (called fts mutants for "filament forming temperature sensitive".) So general is this phenomenon that, over 30 years ago, we commented in a review: "…it seems possible that any chemical at some concentration, whether attainable in the laboratory or not, can cause filament formation." (When the great geneticist, Rollin Hotchkiss, heard of this, he muttered: How depressing! ) Be that as it may, filamentation is to bacteria what fever is to children.
Filaments, in both bacteria and fungi, result when rod-shaped cells cease to divide but continue to grow. In many cases, growth can continue for quite a while and at a rapid speed, resulting in long and often healthy-looking filaments. Nucleoids continue to segregate and are spaced normally along the filament. (Some folks like to call this polyploidy, but multinucleate seems more appropriate.) Apparently, under some circumstances, cell division is a dispensable process – at least for a while.
To show how indifferent cell growth can be to whether a cell divides or not, cells also become filamentous when decatenation of their intertwined progeny chromosomes is inhibited by mutation or by drugs. Given the pleiotropic nature of the response, it has proven difficult to figure out why cell division is so much more delicate than the rest of the cell's functions.
For now, let's leave questions of mechanism aside and ask instead, how this phenomenon matters in the ecology of these organisms. This question has recently been examined in an article from Scott Hultgren's lab. The article goes a long way towards making sense of why bacteria might have developed such a strategy. It is pleasurable reading, illustrated with many exciting instances. Their examples suggest that filamentation can confer protection against grazing predators (including phagocytes in mammalian hosts), resistance to intracellular killing, swarming motility to evade immune cells, and insensitivity to some antibiotics and other inimical agents.
Making filaments to avoid grazing by predatory protists is often seen in marine and other environments. In general, bacteria longer than 7 μm are inedible by many protists, and filamentation occurs in direct response to effectors produced by the predators. In other cases, for example in some Proteus, filamentation is part of their life cycle. These organisms "swarm" intermittently on agar as well as on the surface of catheters. The pathogenic E. coli that cause urinary tract infections invade the epithelial cells of the bladder, and there they transform into filaments some 50 times the normal length. This strategy enables these filamenting bacteria (and others) to survive engulfment by phagocytic cells. Also, at body temperatures, Legionella make phagocytosis-resistant biolfilms composed of filamentous cells.
After completing their extensive survey, the authors conclude that filamentation is a survival tactic employed by diverse bacteria under a variety of conditions. Considering the reliance of some pathogens on filamentation, they suggest that drugs blocking filament formation may be useful against specific pathogens. We thank the authors for calling attention to the broad ecological aspects of this distinctive bacterial (and fungal) talent.
I finish with an aside: the opposite of filamentation, that is, division without growth, also occurs. In the lab, bacterial cells in stationary phase are generally smaller than growing ones. Likewise, most bacteria making a living in oligotrophic environments are on the small side, some so small as to merit the label nanobacteria. I recall once observing under the microscope the "growth" of E. coli on purified agar containing only phosphate buffer. Each cell divided three or four times, resulting in an average cell size 1/8 to 1/16 of the starting one! Filaments count, but so do numbers.
We have operated a biofilm reacor for extended periods. From it myhxobacteria as well as social ameoba were isolated. Both cause E. coli on agar plates to turn into healthily growing filaments. Back on clean plates E.coli reverts back to a non filamentous mutant. So E.coli might in nature be more frequently growing as filaments?
I would not mind collaborating on this by producing a paper with an interested microbiologist.
Posted by: Ralf Cord | December 04, 2013 at 04:32 AM