by Elio
We continue our series of images that have made a difference in microbiology. This one, published by John Cairns in 1963 has earned a most deserved place in textbooks and reviews. It shows a radioautograph of an intact E. coli chromosome in the act of replicating. From this image, Cairns concluded that the E. coli chromosome is:
- a single piece of double stranded DNA, 700−900 μm long, and
- circular.
These truths had been surmised from other, mainly indirect pieces of evidence. For instance, the idea that the genome consists of a single chromosome had already been inferred from the fact that only a single genetic linkage group could be found in E. coli. Its circular nature had been suspected because all the genes on the chromosome were circularly permuted. But this image gave these notions physical authenticity, ergo finality. Such important conclusions from one single picture!
In addition, by labeling the newly replicated DNA in the chromosome with a short pulse of tritiated thymidine, Cairns provided conclusive evidence for the bidirectionality of chromosome replication, with each of the two replicating forks containing one new and one old DNA strand.
Correction
As pointed out by Christoph Weigel and David Lane, I wrongly attributed to Cairns the evidence that the E. coli chromosome replicates bidirectionally. In fact, the definitive proof stems from a later elegant radioautographic study by Prescott and Kuempel and several equally convincing genetic experiments, e.g., by Masters and Broda. A regrettable memory lapse…..
Elio - and your correspondents - you are right in saying this should be taught. It is an excellent example of how pre-conceptions lead to faulty conclusions. The molecule and its circularity are beyond dispute of course, but Cairns concluded on the basis of grain density that it was replicating unidirectionally from point X. A moment's contemplation of the interpretative diagram shows that it misrepresents the radioautogram and makes no sense in terms of replication either. In fact the molecule shown was from cells labelled uniformly (two generations, if memory serves); the real demonstration of bidirectionality was the Prescott & Kuempel paper, and at the same time Masters & Broda who used a different cunning technique.
Posted by: David Lane | April 02, 2013 at 02:10 AM